viernes, 1 de mayo de 2015

MÁS LECCIONES DE HONESTIDAD.





Santoña, 29 de abril 2015           (english version/summary below)
  
"La absolución del culpable es la condena del juez".            Publio Siro

Esta entrada en el blog, estando reciente la última sobre el impresentable J.A. Martín Pallín, obedece a un cabreo monumental y permanente. Y no estoy dispuesto a callarme sin manifestar lo que pienso de estos tipos, JUECES DE NADA MENOS QUE EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO Y EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. Alguno de ellos ha participado, tambien, en la condena a Garzón por ...!!PREVARICACIÓN!!

Vengo de ingresar en la Hacienda Pública, 2.000:- euros que, por lo visto, les debo en el IRPF de años atrás. Mis ingresos son de unos 17.500.- euros brutos más/ menos, en la actualidad, como sigue:a) 12.800.- Seguridad Social. b) 4.700.- Mutualidad Colegio de Abogados. Pago a cuenta unos 1.500.- euros anuales. 

No voy a discutir las cifras sino, solamente, hacer una observación para que, quien lea estas líneas, pueda hacerse una idea. En las dos últimas entradas del blog que podéis leer, describo el ROBO que se me hizo en su día con la
 IMPRESCINDIBLE COOPERACIÓN de los jueces. Más de 75.000.- euros del AÑO 1993. Como consecuencia de ello, y tener que hacerme una casa pagándola DOS VECES, tuve que proceder a solicitar la prejubilación; adelantarla 3 años (PÉRDIDA DEL 24%; unos 330 euros mensuales) porque el dinero de que disponía para vivir hasta la edad final de jubilación, 65 años, TUVE QUE UTILIZARLO en hacerme la casa QUE YA HABÍA PAGADO A QUIENES TENÍAN QUE HABERLA HECHO. 

Eso sucedió cuando tenía 60 años. Por tanto, llevo 15 años cobrando unos 4.000.- euros al año menos de lo que me correspondería. Es decir, sin contar gastos cuantiosos, unos 125.000.- euros. 

Y TODOS LOS MESES ME SIGUEN ROBANDO GRACIAS A LOS INDECENTES QUE FIGURAN  
EN LA LISTA AL FINAL DE LA PRIMERA ENTRADA DEL BLOG. HASTA EL FIN DE MIS DÍAS, SUMA Y SIGUE, CON LA PARTICULARIDAD DE QUE, DEL MISMO MODO, SEGUIRÉ PAGANDO IMPUESTOS PARA QUE QUIENES "COOPERARON NECESARIAMENTE" A QUE  ME ROBARAN, CONTINÚEN COBRANDO SUS SUELDOS.

Lo siento, es más de lo que puedo soportar sin poner de manifiesto QUIENES SON LOS IMPRESENTABLES que HAN ACTUADO DE ESTA FORMA, algunos de los cuales siguen dictando sentencias, autos, providencias y demás mandangas, si no dando lecciones de honestidad (?!) en los medios, y un servidor cobrando 330.- euros menos todos los meses, sin contar con el global mangado.

ES DECIR, ME ROBARON EN SU DÍA, INSISTO,  CON SU "COOPERACIÓN NECESARIA" Y YO LES PAGO EL SALARIO CON MIS IMPUESTOS POR EL RESTO DE MIS DÍAS. PORQUE ME SIGUEN ROBANDO, VÍA PENSIÓN SIN COBRAR, MES A MES, 

ESTA ES LA DEMOCRACIA INSTAURADA EN ESTE PAÍS. 

 Y SU   JUSTICIA.


Que CONSTE.

Eugenio de la Cuesta Gutiérrez     DNI 13.564.082Q

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“The absolution of a guilty person means the condemnation of the judge”
Publio Siro

This entry in the blog, still being recent the previous last one over the behavior of the judge, J.A. Martin Pallin, is due to my permanent and big rage. And I am not willing to shut my mouth without first giving evidence  of what I think about these guys, judge members of both Supreme and Constitutional Courts in the so called Kingdom of Spain

I just come from the Treasury Office where I have deposited 2.000.- euros they claim I am debtor for last years income tax. My gross earnings are more or less 17.500.- euros per year, composed as follows
a) 12.800.- Social Security. b) 4.700.-euros corresponding to my  Lawyers Mutual Benefit Society.

I have to advance on account about 1.500.-per year on a monthly regular basis. I am not going to discuss the figures except for calling your attention with a particular remark that explains the contents of my attitude/letters of protest.

In the two last entries of the blog that you can read, I make a full description of the robbery I suffered years ago due to the bare essential COLLABORATION OF THE JUDGES. More than 75.000.- euros, year 1993. As a consecuence I had to pay twice my house and run with no money left to survive for my own account so that I had to ask for an advance of retirement of three years ( it meant a loss 24% income per year; about 330 euros per month). By now about 125.000.- euros and it continues. A bargain…

I.e., I had no money left after paying the house TWICE, first time to those who under contract neither imported nor  erected it and disappeared with the funds delivered to them for that purpose, and second to import the house from USA and construct it in Spain for my own account. 

AND IT WILL CONTINUE TO BE SO EVERY MONTH, FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE, DUE TO THE OBSCENE BEHAVIOR OF THE JUDGES WHO ARE LISTED AT THE END OF THE  FIRST ENTRY OF THE BLOG.  BETTER YOU KNOW WHO THEY ARE.

AND, AGAIN, IT HAPPENS THAT I SHALL HAVE TO GO ON  PAYING WITH MY TAXES, NO MATTER HOW HUMBLE THEY COULD BE NOW,  FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE. AND THAT MONEY WILL BE USED TO PAY THE SALARIES OF THOSE WHO COLLABORATED WITH THE THIEVES/FRAUDSTERS FOR UNMENTIONABLE REASONS. 

THE ROBBERY IS ENDLESS AND, BELIEVE IT OR NOT, ACCORDING TO SPANISH LAW/JUDGES, I HAVE NO CHANCES TO RECOVER IT FOR A SIMPLE REASON: I WOULD HAVE TO APPLY TO THE SAME INDIVIDUALS/JUDGES WHO HAVE COMMITED THE CRIMINAL ACTION.
SO PERVERSE IS THE JUDITIAL SPANISH SYSTEM. 
A GOOD JOKE: THEY WOULD HAVE TO CONDEM THEMSELVES FOR HE BREACH OF THEIR OFFICIAL DUTY.
IT´´S  EASIER TO CRUSH A CITIZEN THAN BEING JUST.

Sorry, this is more than that I can stand without leaving it clear who are the components of the herd of crooks. Never mind the personal o professional category they have.
AND WE ARE CONSIDERING THE LABOUR OF JUDGES IN TE SUPREME/CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN.

I REGRET THAT THE FULL/LONG STORY IS NARRATED IN SPANISH (first entries) BUT I SHALL TRY TO SUMMARIZE:

WE ARE TALKING OF JUDGES IN TE SUPREME/CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS OF THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN WHO FOLLOWING THEIR BEST TRADITION OF AMAZING AND WONDERFUL THEORIES WITHIN THE FIELD OF JURIDICAL SCIENCE, HAVE DISCOVERED THAT IF A PLAINTIFF WANTS TO SUCCEED IN HIS CLAIM AGAINST A DEFENDANT, HE MUST PRESENT INVENTED ILLEGAL EVIDENCE OR NONEXISTENT/IMPOSSIBLE FACTS OR DOCUMENTS IN FAVOUR OF THAT DEFENDANT SO THAT THE CLAIM IS REDUCED TO NOTHING AND DISMISSED,  

THEY ARE ASKING ME TO PROVE I AM STUPID, THAT  I DON´T  REACH THEIR OWN INTELLIGENCE/HONESTY LEVEL.

THIS IS THE MOST UPDATED AND ADVANCED THEORY  TO PROTECT THE THIEVES AGAINST PLAINTIFFS WHICH LOOKS TO BE ONE OF THE FINAL TARGETS OF THE SPANISH SUPREME COURT.                       THEY HAVE DISCOVERED A NEW AND UNIVERSAL DOCTRINE  !!!  
I DO REALISE IT¨S HARDLY BELIEVABLE BUT BE SURE IT¨S NOT A JOKE.
SUPPOSEDLY THEY HAVE SWORN TO STICK TO THE LAW AND CONSTITUTION.

I shall continue speaking loud and clear. Here I am at their disposal but with light and stenographer.


Eugenio de la Cuesta Gutiérrez     DNI 13.564.082Q

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have to offer you for lecture a short summary of the facts. It started with a criminal case against the three partners in a society to whom I had delivered an advance of some 45.000.- euros (year 1993) with the purpose of importing a house from USA, to assemble and erect it in a plot of land of my property.


They never imported nor built the house and so, for amazing it might be, THE ACCUSED DEFENDANTS TEMSHELVES recognized that the money delivered to them disappeared before touching a single brick AND THAT HAD USED IT FOR THEIR OWN AFFAIRS.

I presented before the Criminal Court a case for “misappropiation” of the money delivered to them exclusively for that purpose, to import and build a house. (I emphasize this point because the printed Spanish law and doctrine elaborated by these same judges consider that simple “deviation” a criminal action of "misappropiation").

Surprisingly, the judge dictates a sentence wherein he assures the above facts are true and real but, more surprisingly, he AFFIRMS that the crooks............ HAVE IMPORTED AND BUILT THE HOUSE”. !!!!!!!!!!

He gives absolutory sentence and free the guys from any charge. This sentence is confirmed afterwards by an appellation Court composed of three members. In the best of assumptions THEY DO NOT READ THE CONTENTS OF APPEAL.

None of the judges involved are either blind or dumb and it´s supposed to be in power of average intelligence. I have to insist on it:  a copy of the court declarations of the accused as shown bellow have allways been given incorporated to the appeals.

As a consequence of the above I had to import the house for my own account and pay for it, AS EXPLAINED, TWICE. I COULD NEVER RECOVER THE MONEY.

I was therefore obliged, to protect my RIGHTS/MONEY, to present again a criminal case now for breach of duty, misconduct..  (prevaricación) against the judges involved up to Supreme Court of this Kingdom named Spain. This criminal action is contemplated in Spanish Criminal Law in two cases:  a) inexcusable ignorance”; b) “violation of law on purpose (“a sabiendas”).

My case, and I was warned from the very start by experts that being a normal/humble citizen would be a drawback, was dismissed until it reached the Supreme Court and, no less important, the Constitutional Court that finds it “logical and without breach of law”.

Well, even if this is a little bit boring, let me quote herein the declarations of the three accused/defendants (translation from Spanish into English) in writing and oral/presence briefings. THE JUDGES, ALL OF THEM, INCLUDING THOSE OF SUPREME AND CONSTITUCTIONAL COURTS, ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE READ THE PROVIDED DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE CASE, I have in all cases given them copies:

“Accused Mr. García:

“.. the house was directly imported by Mr. Cuesta and our society did not built it” , “the society Casas Usa only participated  in the construction by a third party of the concrete basement to put on it the house ” . (The invoice, UNPAID, for these works, has been delivered to the so called judges).

Mr. Cuesta imported the house directly”; “that the bank check for about four million pesetas was not deposited in an account of Casas Usa. ”I firmly declare that I did not collaborate to import the house. That it was Mr. Cuesta himself who imported the house…”
“That Mr. Cuesta delivered four and more million pesetas that were not deposited in any account of Casas Usa……that if that  would have been the contrary, Casas Usa, would have imported and built the house…”

Accused Mr. Izquierdo:
….we only had prepared the concrete basement…. That after august 1993 Casas Usa did not receive the house or imported it…That it was Mr. Cuesta himself who made the importation and built the house…”

Accused Mr. González :
” That we first asked for the house but that afterwards it was Mr. Cuesta who imported it directly…”

 ORAL briefings in presence: we only made the concrete basement…”…we did not import the house…”. “ ..Mr. Cuesta built the house”.


The rest of the money, up to 45.000.- euros, including a bill of exchange, was used/cashed to pay PERSONAL DEBTS OF ONE OF THE PARTNERS WITH BANCO DE SANTANDER. This bank is an active participant in the robbery.


I´TS NECCESARY TO CLEAR OUT ONE THING MORE: THE INVOICE FOR THE BASEMENT HAS BEEN INCORPORATED AND NUMBERED TO THE CASE.  IT REMAINS UNPAID EVEN TO THE THIRD PARTY WHO MADE IT. I.E. ALL MONEY DISSAPEARS, EVAPORATES.

And here we are. We all can imagine that our Judges through the system, from the very beginning up to the end of the hierarchy are, let´s say, normal human beings. We should even think that their intelligence average level is far more above the normal citizens.  And when talking of Supreme /Constitutional  Court members we can not avoid a feeling of true respect, admiration and recognition of their knowledge not only of our laws but also of the analisys capacity they have been gratified by the Nature. Honestity is given as granted.

And here below we have a fantastic example. We all would think that if somebody says he has not imported a house nor erected it, and that the money received for that job has evaporated, it´s because really he has not “imported and constructed” the house. And this despite they risk going to jail by declaring so.

We all are wrong; we have not been able to find out what they actually meant. Sorry if in this case I allow myself quoting in spanish the text of the Supreme Court resolution with the translation into English. THEY HAVE EVENTUALLY FOUND THE TRUE REASONS:

El hecho de no haberse acreditado el importe de los trabajos llevados a cabo por CASAS USA en los terrenos del querellante impedía conocer el alcance concreto de la apropiación indebida”.
 “The fact of not having SPECIFIED  to how much amounts the works made by CASAS USA in the plot of land of the plaintiff PREVENTED from knowing the EXACT QUANTITY OF THE MISAPPROPIATON”.

I.e. THE GUYS DECLARE BEFORE THE COURT THEY HAVE STOLEN ME ALL THE MONEY DELIVERED AND HAVE NOT TOUCHED A SINGLE BRICK BUT I have to prove the existence of nonexistent works and evaluate them. And, more important  EUREKA!, the plaintiff has to invent and invoice nonexistent  works to cut down his claim or reduce it to nothing.     Isn´t fantastic? They do not mention if I have to apologise  for the annoyances or invite the thieves to holydays in Marbella. They have not been able to solve out the equation: 45.000 euros.- less 0,0,0,0= X.       To obtain a correct and definitive result it´s neccessary to quote/introduce an INVENTED FIGURE.            PITAGORAS AND SPANISH SUPREME/CONSTITUTIONAL COURT JUDGES dixit.
My final solution submitted to them, that the X is 45.000.- euros, was wrong.

Mind, this new criminal law theory has been discovered by our Supreme Court, pride of the Kingdom of Spain.

De otro lado las sucesivas modificaciones que el contrato originario sufrió a lo largo de los distintos avatares por los incumplimientos de la citada empresa impedía también la tipicidad, pues, como dijo el Juzgado de lo Penal, “en todo caso, sería una cuestión meramente civil a dilucidar en esta clase de jurisdicción”.

“On the other hand the successive amendments suffered by the original contract due to breaks on the part of the defendants (!!!), prevents the classification of the crime and should, therefore be considered as a civil claim”.

Again, our Supreme Court discovers a new doctrine to be enjoyed by the Universe: the plaintiff has to help the defendants by supplying the court with nonexistent modifications of contract; if the contrary, one can not see why the lawyers defendants do not  help their clients by presenting them. IT HAS TO BE DONE BY THE PLAINTIFF AGAINST HIS OWN INTEREST AND IN FAVOUR OF THE THIEVES, EVEN IF THESE AMENDMENTS DO NOT EXIST. And last but no least, one pays an amount of money to build a house, those who have received it declare they have not made the house, that they have used ALL the money for their own affairs…and it´s a “civil claim”.

This marvelous and amazing legal theory, demonstrates, once more, how honest and professional are our judges in a pathetic exercise of obscene corporatism on account of the rights/money of a citizen.

A final remark. This resolution has been signed, among others, by three of the Supreme Court judges that condemned Judge Garzón for misbehavior and betraying his duty. The three are underlined with red colour in the list shown at the end of first entry in the blog.

Please find herein an outstanding token, among others, of the theory elaborated by them for that purpose, expel Mr. Garzón from the corporate body of Judges:
It¨s enough that the Judge knows that his decision can not be hold in law, and that he would never reach that conclusion by using the methods or ways most appropiate, but only by arbitrarily imposing his own will, wish or criteria over the rational interpretation of law… “.
“In the present case….it would mean admitting practices  that in the present times only can be found in dictatorial regimens wherein anything can be justified”. 

They remain very satisfied being paid for their work (?) and regularly awarded with medals, honors and especial treatments. Unfortunately they have not added that these rules/principles are there to be passed over/violated WHEN THEY FEEL LIKE with the purpose of PROTECTING THEMSELVES AGAINST THEIR OWN CRIMINAL ACTIONS.

Never mind if it´s crushing the rights/money of a citizen: in the Spanish democracy the judges can decide that two plus two are, for example, seven, if it goes to their profit.  And nothing happens.

Very important: THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, EFFICIENT AND WATCHFUL OBSERVER OF OUR RIGHTS, TO WHOM I ASKED FOR RIGHT OF PROTECTION CONTEMPLATED IN THE LAW (“AMPARO” ) FINDS ALL IT VERY logical, reasonable and without breaks in the conclusions”.  They confirm the proverb: "dogs do not eat dog´s meat”.

They say, even former King Juan Carlos announced it on TV, and seemed to be talking seriously, that the Constitution GRANTS that we all are equal before law.                                    IT SOUNDS WONDERFUL (Alicia dixit).


No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario